Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop Entrusted Her Wealth to Native Hawaiians. Now, the Learning Centers Her People Created Face Legal Challenges

Champions of a private school system established to instruct Native Hawaiians describe a new lawsuit attacking the admissions process as a clear attempt to ignore the intentions of a Hawaiian princess who left her inheritance to guarantee a better tomorrow for her people nearly 140 years ago.

The Tradition of Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop

These educational institutions were created in the will of Bernice Pauahi Bishop, the great-granddaughter of the founding monarch and the final heir in the dynasty. When she died in 1884, the her holdings held roughly 9% of the Hawaiian islands' entire territory.

Her will established the Kamehameha schools using those estate assets to finance them. Now, the network includes three campuses for primary and secondary schooling and 30 kindergarten programs that emphasize learning centered on native culture. The institutions educate about 5,400 students throughout all educational levels and possess an trust fund of approximately $15 billion, a sum greater than all but about 10 of the United States' most elite universities. The institutions receive no money from the federal government.

Competitive Admissions and Economic Assistance

Enrollment is highly competitive at every level, with only about one in five applicants securing a place at the secondary school. These centers additionally fund about 92% of the cost of teaching their pupils, with almost 80% of the student body also obtaining different types of financial aid according to economic situation.

Historical Context and Cultural Significance

A prominent scholar, the head of the Hawaiʻinuiākea School of Hawaiian Knowledge at the University of Hawaii, explained the educational institutions were founded at a period when the Native Hawaiian population was still on the decline. In the late 1880s, roughly 50,000 Native Hawaiians were estimated to live on the Hawaiian chain, down from a peak of from 300,000 to half a million inhabitants at the time of contact with Europeans.

The native government was truly in a unstable situation, specifically because the U.S. was growing increasingly focused in securing a long-term facility at the naval base.

The dean stated across the 20th century, “almost everything Hawaiian was being sidelined or even removed, or very actively suppressed”.

“During that era, the learning centers was truly the single resource that we had,” the academic, a graduate of the centers, stated. “The establishment that we had, that was just for us, and had the capacity minimally of ensuring we kept pace of the general public.”

The Legal Challenge

Now, the vast majority of those enrolled at the centers have Hawaiian descent. But the new suit, filed in federal court in Honolulu, says that is inequitable.

The lawsuit was filed by a organization called Students for Fair Admissions, a activist organization based in Virginia that has for decades waged a court fight against affirmative action and ancestry-related acceptance. The association took legal action against the prestigious college in 2014 and ultimately achieved a precedent-setting high court decision in 2023 that resulted in the right-leaning majority eliminate ethnicity-based enrollment in higher education across the nation.

An online platform launched in the previous month as a precursor to the legal challenge notes that while it is a “excellent educational network”, the schools’ “acceptance guidelines openly prioritizes pupils with indigenous heritage rather than applicants of other backgrounds”.

“Indeed, that priority is so extreme that it is practically impossible for a non-Native Hawaiian student to be accepted to Kamehameha,” the organization states. “Our position is that priority on lineage, rather than merit or need, is neither fair nor legal, and we are dedicated to stopping the schools' illegal enrollment practices in court.”

Legal Campaigns

The effort is headed by a legal strategist, who has overseen groups that have filed more than a dozen court cases challenging the application of ancestry in schooling, industry and across cultural bodies.

Blum declined to comment to journalistic inquiries. He told another outlet that while the association endorsed the educational purpose, their programs should be accessible to the entire community, “not exclusively those with a specific genetic background”.

Learning Impacts

An assistant professor, a scholar at the graduate school of education at Stanford, stated the lawsuit targeting the Kamehameha schools was a notable case of how the fight to reverse anti-discrimination policies and guidelines to promote equitable chances in schools had moved from the battleground of higher education to elementary and high schools.

Park stated conservative groups had focused on Harvard “very specifically” a decade ago.

In my view the challenge aims at the educational institutions because they are a exceptionally positioned school… much like the approach they chose Harvard with clear intent.

The scholar said even though preferential treatment had its detractors as a relatively narrow instrument to increase academic chances and entry, “it was an important instrument in the arsenal”.

“It functioned as an element in this wider range of regulations accessible to learning centers to broaden enrollment and to build a more just learning environment,” the expert commented. “Eliminating that mechanism, it’s {incredibly harmful

Todd Wilson
Todd Wilson

Tech writer and AI researcher passionate about demystifying complex technologies for a broader audience.